case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-24 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3033 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3033 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Kushiel's Legacy]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Young Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Blake's 7]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Doc Martin]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. http://i.imgur.com/XWQxPJy.jpg?2
[linked for close up shot of naked butt]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Disney]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Phantom of the Opera/Twilight]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Captain America]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Spec Ops: The Line]


__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Final Fantasy XIV - A Realm Reborn]



__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILERS for Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Episode VII)]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for incest]

[Folgers Coffee Commercial]


__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for suicide, emotional abuse]



__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for abusive parenting, domestic abuse]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-24 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
You are a lunatic if you think those two words are equivocal.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-24 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
No, they kinda are. Just black people are no longer seen as acceptable targets in the way women currently are.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Whore and slut are used for both. Though most people say "manwhore" or "manslut".
mekkio: (Default)

Re: AOU interviews

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-04-25 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
No, they aren't. Just because you declare racist slurs and sexist slurs the same doesn't make it the same.

For one thing, if I switched the genders of the character so that instead of Natasha being called a slut, it's now Howard Stark being called a slut, most people wouldn't be up in arms. However, I can't do that same thing with racial slurs. If I exchanged Nick Fury for Storm and used the same racial slur, the same amount of people would be angry.

Racial slurs =/= sexist slurs.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
lol what even is this comment?

yes, racism and sexism are different things.
yes, sexism is usually directed at women.

what kind of point are you even trying to make?

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
They were making the kind of point that seems to have flown right over your head.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Fuck off with this Oppression Olympics shit.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
They don't have to be equivalent (which is what I think you mean, not "equivocal"?) to consider whether or not it's acceptable to insult a fictional character. If as mekkio says, it's no big deal because Nick Fury is not a real person, then you're only disputing the degree of seriousness of the insult.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: AOU interviews

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-04-25 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
But why would you call Nick that in the first place?

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't. The anon who brought up Nick Fury was using it as a hypothetical example. If we follow your reasoning, nobody should be upset over calling a fictional character what might be deemed a demeaning term in real life.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Why would you call Natasha that in the first place?

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Why should Natasha be called a slut?