case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-24 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3033 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3033 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Kushiel's Legacy]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Young Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Blake's 7]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Doc Martin]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. http://i.imgur.com/XWQxPJy.jpg?2
[linked for close up shot of naked butt]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Disney]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Phantom of the Opera/Twilight]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Captain America]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Spec Ops: The Line]


__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Final Fantasy XIV - A Realm Reborn]



__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILERS for Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Episode VII)]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for incest]

[Folgers Coffee Commercial]


__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for suicide, emotional abuse]



__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for abusive parenting, domestic abuse]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: AOU interviews

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-04-25 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
IT'S A FICTIONAL CHARACTER FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!

No one real was hurt. Natasha Romanov isn't somewhere crying her eyes out or sharpening a blade in revenge.

And how many jokes are made at James. T. Kirk's sluttage? The biggest whore in any gender in any universe. He will sleep with anything that moves. Literally. Even if he doesn't know where to stick it, you know he will try.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying Natasha was hurt or that we should take the feelings of fictional characters into consideration. I'm saying that there might be a good reason for Renner to apologize for implying that when a woman has many partners, that makes her a slut.

"And how many jokes are made at James. T. Kirk's sluttage? The biggest whore in any gender in any universe. He will sleep with anything that moves. Literally. Even if he doesn't know where to stick it, you know he will try."

I don't think I said that men weren't made fun of for being sexually active, only that it's not as loaded a term when applied to a man.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
It's not about offending Natasha Romanov.

It's about the fact that it was considered okay to call the only woman in a cast a slut/whore because she dared to interact with the rest of the cast, and that this was said in a published interview.

Like, the problem is really obvious, and saying "But she's a fictional character~!" is really derailing the issue.

Re: AOU interviews

(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
But it's the interviewer who brought it up first. Were Renner and Evans supposed to step on their soapboxes and rant about slutshaming and how no one asked Gwyneth Paltrow how she felt when Tony Stark flirted with undercover!Natasha?

It was a stupid joke that was prompted by a stupid question. Why do Renner and Evans get so much flack when it was the interviewer who brought the topic up? (And expected a response along these lines, let's be honest. The interviewer didn't want the two of them to go "*shrug* whatever.")