[ SECRET POST #3034 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3034 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: spoiler threads

[mekkio]

Personally, I like the ten year rule. If something has been out for at least ten years, you can spoil it. That should give anyone enough time to read or watch it.

Re: spoiler threads

[philstar22]

I'd vote 2-3 years at most. But I'd also say that if the thing is an adaption, the time limit is for the original version. So, like, Hobbit stuff is okay because the book has been out for a long time.

Re: spoiler threads

[mekkio]

You would think that would be okay but there are still people who don't read things like comics and get upset when comic book readers spoiler shows and movies even though the comic has been out for decades.

See Gwen Stacy's ending in the last Spider-man film.

Re: spoiler threads

[philstar22]

But see, I think the collapsing spoilers thing should be about people who don't have access. Once they have access and yet choose not to view whatever it is, I don't think there should be any expectation of other people not spoiling anymore.

Although, comics are different because the movie aren't direct adaptions. I'm talking about things that are actual adaptions (and I'd still say collapse anything adaption-specific).

Re: spoiler threads

[(Anonymous)]

Not everyone has seen everything, it doesn't matter when it came out. If I have seen the end of a fifty year old movie it is still a spoiler, so be polite and hide that shit.

Re: spoiler threads

[diet_poison]

thank you.

I mean I'd be more "I see both sides" if warning for spoilers were actually hard but damn it is so, so not hard at all.

Re: spoiler threads

[world_eater]

This oh god this so much.


I don't care about spoilers, sometimes I spoil myself just for the fun of it. But I really don't get why people whine SO HARD about warning for spoilers it's just baffling.