case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-26 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3035 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3035 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: f!s, I need some perspective :( (Arthur Conan Doyle drama)

(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
the last one overrides it

if you didn't idolize him or were able to separate work from creator, this wouldn't be that big of a deal
dreemyweird: (austere)

Re: f!s, I need some perspective :( (Arthur Conan Doyle drama)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2015-04-26 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Um, sorry, I think I was in so much turmoil that I failed to make it clear that I don't start disliking works once I start disliking their creators. I'm perfectly capable of seeing literary beauty in a brilliantly written text, even if its author is a dick.

But I'm never passionate about these texts as much as I am passionate about those whose authors I love. I'm basically only an active fan of the works whose creators I consider essentially good people. I think it's reasonable and doesn't have anything to do with my -idolizing- these authors? It's just the way my literary experience works.

Re: f!s, I need some perspective :( (Arthur Conan Doyle drama)

(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
No one is an essentially good person, though.

Everyone is capable of doing terrible shit. Even the nicest people are capable of doing terrible things.

Re: f!s, I need some perspective :( (Arthur Conan Doyle drama)

(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
da

Pretty much this, as awful as it sounds. Does that excuse people from doing terrible things? No. Whether or not they're punished for doing terrible things, that's a separate argument. Which involves a thorny discussion as to the nature of forgiveness and repentance, which may not even apply in this situation. Basically, you forgive the people who did terrible things, not to give them an advantage, but to give YOU the advantage, to let go of it. Much easier said than done. Whether or not the people who did terrible things truly repent, by changing their lives and seeking to redress the wrongs they have committed, is completely irrelevant to whether or not you forgive them.

TL;DR: Humans are fallible, and some are way more fallible than others. Looking past/beyond that fallibility improves your own outlook, not theirs.
dreemyweird: (austere)

Re: f!s, I need some perspective :( (Arthur Conan Doyle drama)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2015-04-27 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with that. But it's one thing to be capable of something terrible, and quite another to have actually done it.