[ SECRET POST #3035 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3035 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Being Pro-Censorship

[(Anonymous)]

Like you said, I don't think the solution is to censor things but rather to supply more information and background along with the books children have access to. Those are two different things

Re: Being Pro-Censorship

[(Anonymous)]

Right but it's just that I think that this could be such a burden on schools that it would simply lead to a lot of schools removing books altogether (if, for example, they had to find a nonfiction book to pair with every novel I do think they would simply remove the novel). And in that sense, I do think it can be seen as censorship.

But even then, I'd rather they just removed the book altogether. Do you see what I mean?

Re: Being Pro-Censorship

[(Anonymous)]

I think there's places where it wouldn't even be possible to point out the historical fact that the Civil War was launched by the South in an attempt to maintain the institution of slavery despite the fact that the North wasn't attempting to abolish it, or whatever other historical element you're talking about. There's a lot of Lost Cause revisionism out there.

So it's a nice ideal, but there are some practical difficulties in trying to educate your way out of it. And the same in a lot of other areas.