[ SECRET POST #3036 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3036 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Big Bang Theory]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jamie Oliver]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jed and Leo, The West Wing]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Shipwrecked Comedy (YouTube)]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Conan O'Brien]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Star Trek]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Regular Show]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anne of Green Gables]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Tintin]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Ciel nosurge]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Angel]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Dragon Age]


__________________________________________________



14.
(Joann Fletcher)


__________________________________________________



15. http://i.imgur.com/xEVbfF2.png
[John Ridley, cut on request for blatant racial slurs and stuff]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

While I agree that it is hard to define the boundary there are somethings that are definitely over it - like cutting the line of a fire house being used to put out a house fire.

I don't actually think that's the right narrative to use at the moment because holding up the above example, or the looting as part of a righteous cause is...well. Wrong. Those things aren't about a cause beyond maliciousness.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this. I don't think you need to know exactly where the boundary between anger at society and maliciousness is, to know that this is way over it. And getting all hair-splitty over where exactly the boundary is just sounds like trying to absolve the people who are doing the malicious acts.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah.

At least for me (as the one who was making the defensive posts), it's one part pre-emptive strike against politicization of the thing, and one part engrained skepticism about certain kinds of social judgment.

Of course it is over the line and of course the people who are doing the malicious shit are awful.