[ SECRET POST #3037 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3037 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: e_e

[(Anonymous)]

It's a little more nuanced then that. It depends on what genes you are inserting into your crops. For example in biology (and my memory might be fuzzy, this was awhile ago), we talked about a case where a gene that coded for a protein found in almonds was inserted into a crop for some reason or another. Although, not particularly harmful on its own, there was a huge issue of people with nut allergies having reactions without realizing why.

I don't have a problem with GMOs in principle. However, if I were to buy gentically modified food, I would want to know what genes are being inserted and why they are being inserted.