[ SECRET POST #3041 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I do feel like there needs to be some perspective on fucked-up shit

[(Anonymous)]

like what and how do you suggested they be regulated/examined/what have you?

Re: I do feel like there needs to be some perspective on fucked-up shit

[sarillia]

I don't know. I'm not proposing any solutions. Which is probably another reason both sides don't like me.

Taking fantasies about children as an example, actual research is unclear about whether indulging in those fantasies with porn makes a person more or less likely to act on them in real life. Yet both sides claim that it absolutely does or does not based on no evidence at all. It's annoying.

Re: I do feel like there needs to be some perspective on fucked-up shit

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT, but OMG, this! I have been looking in vain for the research to back up those claims, either way. But since even fictional portrayals of underage sex are considered child porn in Canada, I don't think there's a whole lot of research going on. Like you said, people claim that it will lead to real-life abuse, and yet, it seems that this is just the accepted wisdom, or anecdotal, with no actual research results to back it up?

Underage is not my kink at all, so I don't actually have a dog in that fight. And yet, I do wonder, sometimes, that the accepted wisdom is that it's necessary simply to drive this kink all the way underground, without even fictional outlets.

I do have a non-con kink, which has never in any way led me towards this behaviour in real-life. So I don't get why one kink is considered a problematic spiral downwards into eventual criminal behaviour, and the other is "well, that's a common kink."