Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3041 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The stupid question thread
(Anonymous) 2015-05-02 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: The stupid question thread
(Anonymous) 2015-05-02 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)Now that you mention it, I can see how that's meant to be sarcastic. It's a little more subtle than other sarcastic bits I've seen online, so it went right over my head. *facepalm*
But yeah, I've read in a few places that it's a really strange situation for Paralympians because of the expectations many people have of the disabled. I was in special ed growing up and surrounded by disabled classmates. I get they need various forms of assistance at different times in their lives, but I also remember not really seeing the wheelchairs or other aids. The nonverbal kids were the biggest mystery to me as a kid, but I know now that they're dealing with circumstances I can barely begin to imagine. On the other hand, Paralympians want something that's pretty universal: recognition of athletic achievement. That's it. No add-ons about achievement in light of their disabilities or anything like that. I think on an individual level people can at least be made aware of that. On a macro level, however, most groups are not there yet and defensive if someone who's not disabled puts forth the notion of treating the disabled with more normalcy than anticipated.
Re: The stupid question thread