[ SECRET POST #3041 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Not every anon has the opportunity to create an account. There are many reasons not to. As long as there is a preferential system, then that discriminates against people who have to comment anon or not comment at all. On the other hand, nothing prevents named users from just going anon other than loss of privilege and status. It would be fairer just to do away with named commenting and keep everyone as an anon and have their comments stand by themselves without privilege or clique.

[blitzwing]

Are you...are you telling us to check our named!user privilege?!?

[solticisekf]

ikr

[(Anonymous)]

Holy shit, you've gone Full Tumblr. never go Full Tumblr, anon.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know if it's truly a privilege argument, but it's true that named users get away with making comments that anons wouldn't. If not affording privilege, it certainly doesn't make for a very level playing field.

Comments and opinions should stand on their own merit, not on who says them.

[blitzwing]

I think that's more about the humanizing effect of a name and a face? It's the same reason when I took online classes in college, I always uploaded an endearing personal pic for my icon, to give me a face and make it harder for professors to crush my dreams guiltlessly.

Personal details and backstory add up, and people feel like they know you. Like how they show a soldier looking at a photo of his girlfriend back home right before he gets exploded--it shows that he is a human and someone loves him, and they were going to get married, weep damnit.

I don't think it amounts to privilege though, cuz you give up plenty in return for it. Your past actions and statements can always be used against you, and if you get in a flaming fight with someone over who Ash Ketchum's dad was, you can't just stroll into the next post and be like "omg! I love Italian food too! This recipe is great, thanks!" cuz they'll be like "Fuck you, Blitzwing. Ash's dad is clearly Giovanni, and I don't want an idiot who thinks otherwise using my grandmother's pasta recipe. Puttana."

[(Anonymous)]

You are a great example of the latter point.

[blitzwing]

Well, it's true that I won't swap recipes with someone who refuses to see the obvious. Professor Oak is Ash's dad.

[(Anonymous)]

Being a dick has conseqences and makes people not want to deal with you, who'd have thought!

[(Anonymous)]

IT'S SHOCKINNNNNNGGG

[(Anonymous)]

But, like, even if you forced the named users to go anon, there are ways of getting around the "anon" portion. Unless you're suggesting case both ban named users + delete signed comments.

- Othellia

[othellia]

Although I also just realized someone else who's not me could sign their posts with my name. Holy fuck, that'd be confusing/wanky.

Othelia!2in0184nn

[(Anonymous)]

Basically the problem of tripcode users on 4chan.

Except without the ability for a secure trip.