case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-02 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3041 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
How is it better if a group of anons is going around harassing a user and telling them to die? Isn't that worse?

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Nah. This is how it works:

Multiple people harassing one person is not stalking.
One person harassing one other person is stalking.
Stalking is bad.
Things other than stalking are not bad.

ergo

Multiple people harassing one person is not bad.
One person harassing one other person is bad.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
One person continuously harassing one other person is bad and harassment.

Multiple people continuously harassing one person is bad and harassment and bullying.

I can buy that it was two or three anons instead of one. I can't buy that it was 20 different anons, each for a different time who only did it once.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
But you must buy it! For the good of Anon!

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
there's probably a couple of people who bothered certain users more than once, but if a certain user is abrasive or especially pompous, it's pretty likely random anons won't take kindly to that

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Not take kindly =/= tell them they're a waste of life and should die every time they post.

I don't think it's stalking to say something someone said was stupid but the level of vitriol directed at jaybie esp wrt autism was honestly awful.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Besides jaybie, when has that happened? dethtoll was fedora tipped for a year, but I'm pretty sure no other user has gotten reoccuring death threats with any noticable frequency.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
To me, the fact that it's happened even once means that it's something that needs to be watched out for. If it's happened once, it can happen again. And that whole situation was so fucked up that it's something that I really don't want to happen. I still feel awful about it happening to Jaybie. So I am very comfortable about being really cautious about that whole kind of thing, since there's clearly at least one person (if not more) who has shown the ability and the willingness to take that kind of criticism and escalate it to the point of psycho stalking.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Only one of the anons zeroed in on the autism. The other two (at least two others) went after her fanficcing and general insecurity about that.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Jaybie really brought that shitstorm on themselves with their over the top reaction. That pile on was their own doing and they deserve very little sympathy for it. Especially with their repeated flounces. If you flounce and come back, you are pretty much asking people to try and provoke you into flouncing again. She should have just made a new account a lot sooner than she did after flouncing.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no. Jaybie didn't deserve any of that bullshit.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Shut the fuck up. That whole situation was ridiculous, the amount of times that person followed her around, and it's ridiculous that anyone is even coming close to defending it.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-03 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
And that is why, medically speaking, you are a moron. One person did not follow Jaybie around. Jaybie pissed off several people at several points but instead of one person relentlessly stalking her. It was different people picking up different points. It is what happens when you make multiple flounces and multiple bullshit bombs. You just wrote it into a narrative of one stalker to satisfy your need to have a convenient narrative where you had a saintly Jaybie and an evil anon. Neither were true. This is why we need to do away with logged in posting, so that no one can claim that all anon are one anon and that logged in user is the victim of a campaign.