[ SECRET POST #3041 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.




__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #435.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But only real anons get accused of it. No one ever is allowed to point out when a named user is doing it, because you just get a load of abuse and called jelly or wanting to get your way. Yet when a named user throws accusations around, then it gets treated like serious business regardless of how obvious it is they are spouting bullshit.

[(Anonymous)]

I never said it was fair, just that it was possible.

I'd be happy with this comm going all-logged-in for that very reason. It's not that hard to make a sock account. But then again, it's not that hard to make SEVERAL sock accounts either.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Or to clarify I never said the practice was fair. The ability to use it is fair game, though.

[(Anonymous)]

How do you know it's "real" anons getting accused of it? Any of the anons accused of that stuff could be named users who are signed out.