Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-11 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #3050 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3050 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Michael Keaton, Eddie Redmayne]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Touken Ranbu (DMM)]
__________________________________________________
04.

(Watership Down)
__________________________________________________
05.

[Republique]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Cardcaptor Sakura]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Donkey Kong Country (TV series)]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Türkisch für Anfänger]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Tom Waits (left), Mark Lanegan (right)]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-11 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)I see political statement as inherently having to be commentary on existing and contemporary political policy and government, or at very least social issue. If the author genuinely intended the gladitorial fights of Hunger Games to be commentary of society's desensitization to violence, that might be a message (though social, not really political). If her "privileged have all" setup directly invoked imagery from the 1% and Wallstreet controversies, then I'd say that's a political message, for example. But if the concept doesn't allude to a contemporary political issue which the author is intending to comment on, I wouldn't call it a political message.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-12 12:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Would it help make this more relevant if Peta worked at Panera, a modern bread establishment
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-12 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)