Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3053 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]
__________________________________________________
03.
[Network]
__________________________________________________
04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]
__________________________________________________
05.
[In Plain Sight]
__________________________________________________
06.
[Captain America: Civil War]
__________________________________________________
07.
[Samurai Warriors]
__________________________________________________
08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Joss Whedon]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
(frozen comment) no subject
It's more about how much the subject matter is being sexualized, than how much nudity there is! I mean if it's a giant close up of a vagina yeah maybe that's a bit much but like someone just happens to be nude or have a butt or boob out? Not really a problem unless they're you know, underage or the picture is meant to be sexual. A picture of a 16 year old posing nude in a window in a movie where she is supposed to be sexual wouldn't be in the same ballpark at all as picture of like, a random 40-y/o woman who is sunbathing topless.