Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3053 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]
__________________________________________________
03.
[Network]
__________________________________________________
04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]
__________________________________________________
05.
[In Plain Sight]
__________________________________________________
06.
[Captain America: Civil War]
__________________________________________________
07.
[Samurai Warriors]
__________________________________________________
08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Joss Whedon]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
(frozen comment) NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 02:27 am (UTC)(link)It doesn't mean "this should morally be hidden."
It doesn't mean "it is right that people think this should be hidden."
It literally means "Not Safe For Work."
As in, this is a thing you can get in trouble at work for in a lot of workplaces if you click on it/look at it while on your work's internet.
As in, the mod is considerate enough to look out for people's jobs and helpfully put a cut and an extra "NFSW" label there, even though there is a NSFW label at the top of the page, so that people who insist on visiting this site at work don't get into trouble for looking at it at work.
In fact. At the present moment. On May 15th 2015. A time that, factually, takes place prior to any future utopia of boob-freedom.
The word or concept of "should" does not enter this conversation in any way, shape, or form.
That is literally the full extent of Not Safe For Work.
Really, you'd encounter a LOT less resistance to this line of thinking if you posted a thread in the GC section in support of the end of breast-covering, instead of trying to tell a mod NOT to protect us users from, you know, getting fired.
(frozen comment) Re: NAYRT
I haven't told a mod what to do. I brought up my concerns and shared my opinion on the matter, which, afaik, I'm welcome to do.
As in, this is a thing you can get in trouble at work for in a lot of workplaces if you click on it/look at it while on your work's internet.
If you want to get technical, no, for most people, you can't. Most workplaces specify something like no "obscene" or "pornographic" material. Image in question is of a nude woman standing at a window. It's not in itself sexual, obscene, or pornographic. Most of the cases of people being fired were for them downloading things from PornHub. Not for looking at an artistic nude on DA.
(frozen comment) Re: NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 05:52 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: NAYRT
(frozen comment) Re: NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 07:22 am (UTC)(link)You need to grow up so much I'm amazed you can reach a keyboard without a little stepladder.
(frozen comment) Re: NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 08:04 am (UTC)(link)We have a talk about sexually seductive and all of you think of a toddler jamming his/her hands on keyboard so you could have your mind numbing, cringy worth 50 shade of grey censored thingy.
Sigh