case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #3053 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Network]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[In Plain Sight]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Captain America: Civil War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Samurai Warriors]


__________________________________________________



08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Joss Whedon]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: ([magi] Jafar)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-05-15 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
have you seen the movie that is being referenced? The scene in the image is intended to be sexual so your arguments about how this particular image is not sexual, have 0 ground here

I have not seen the movie in question (no clue what movie it is) but the image itself is not sexual. It has to be watched in a movie, in context, for it to be sexual. "it's sexual in context, so block it!" it not a very practical cry. Feet, hair, necks, stomachs, can be sexual in context, but they don't get banned from sight.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 07:30 am (UTC)(link)
You can't seriously be that stupid.