[ SECRET POST #3054 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Ib (game)]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Forever]
[WARNING for blood/gore/etc]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[(Anonymous)]

No

*Ideally* all jurors should be open to all options. It's not a bad idea to fill a jury with jurors that aren't ruling out certain ones before they even enter the courtroom.

It's not an idea that works, unfortunately. In practice it ends up in juries that lean toward the death penalty because people tend to be either very for or very against. But to fill half a jury with people who would not consider the death penalty *at all* would make the death penalty no longer an option when it is supposed to be

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[(Anonymous)]

I think there's so much corruption in the picking-and-choosing of juries that the whole concept is meaningless (especially in the fact that they often veto people with higher educations or backgrounds in psychology or law). Not to mention allegations that courts deliberately try to confuse juries in the process.

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I agree. It sucks in practice but the ideal is a good one. Just trying to explain the ideal behind it

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[(Anonymous)]

especially in the fact that they often veto people with higher educations or backgrounds in psychology or law

Wait, what

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[kaijinscendre]

Ah, okay. Thanks for dropping the knowledge! (that was not meant to be sarcastic)