[ SECRET POST #3054 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Ib (game)]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Forever]
[WARNING for blood/gore/etc]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Boston Bomber Sentenced to Death

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think "murder" has any implication besides an ethical judgment and bias. Which I have, so I think it applies.

Anyway, if you only allow governing bodies permission to not commit murder, where do you draw the line? Tyrannical leaders executing peaceful protesters? How about an ISIS-controlled area, are they exempt from murder because they are essentially the body in control? If the US comes out as absurdly corrupt, then can they murder people instead of kill them?

While I certainly understand your argument and the merits of distinction, I believe murder simply implies the killing is not just. Which I don't think it is.