case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-15 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3054 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Ib (game)]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Forever]
[WARNING for blood/gore/etc]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Threesomes

(Anonymous) 2015-05-16 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's not just you. I thought the same, or at least, I don't get why people would agree to a threesome if all the participants weren't at least a little into each other. Like, I'm not sure I'd ever want to be involved in a threesome, but if I did go for it, I wouldn't want the whole thing to feel like a chore.

Re: Threesomes

(Anonymous) 2015-05-16 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes the kink is that one participant is the focus of two partners, or that the central participant is so desirable/horny that they need two partners to satisfy them. It's not the default that everyone's into each other. Personally I'd call that scenario an orgy or group sex rather than a threesome, even if there were still only three people involved (like someone upthread mentioned, threesome to me suggests the 'pivot' description -- two people servicing a third -- even when all participants are the same orientation).

It's very much a YMMV thing depending on those involved.