case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-15 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3054 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Ib (game)]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Forever]
[WARNING for blood/gore/etc]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Vintage Rantage

(Anonymous) 2015-05-16 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
Nayrt

I remember that!

No idea if it's the same person, but that was so bizzare. The argument basically boiled down to "In my family, everytime a black woman was involved with a white man, the man was abusive, therefore all white men who are involved with black women are always abusive, even fictional characters who have never shown signs of being abusive and have no independent existence outside of what people make up for them."

Kind of like a particularly weird version of "My headcanon is the one true correct canon."

Re: Vintage Rantage

(Anonymous) 2015-05-16 09:50 am (UTC)(link)
B..b..but, WASH WAS SO NOT ABUSIVE AND FOR FUCK SAKE DID THIS PERSON SEE EVEN A SECOND OF THE SHOW AND SERENITY!!!!?