[ SECRET POST #3054 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3054 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Ib (game)]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Forever]
[WARNING for blood/gore/etc]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: What traditionally evil (or just generally less sympathetic) figure...

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Nope, there is absolutely nothing redemptive about Milton's portrayal of Satan, and he did not misread his material at all. Satan has to have some attractiveness, some powers of persuasion, or he wouldn't be able to tempt anybody plausibly. But if you look at his noble-sounding rhetoric with any amount of attention, it turns out to be empty, barren and repetitive: it's just Satan claiming, over and over again, that everything he does is somebody else's fault. And that he has no choice--he says that over and over--so no, he's nobody's symbol of glorious freedom.

Re: What traditionally evil (or just generally less sympathetic) figure...

[(Anonymous)]

Nice try Mickey boy, you're just scared of the rematch.

Re: What traditionally evil (or just generally less sympathetic) figure...

[(Anonymous)]

I see you don't have an actual argument based on the text, which doesn't surprise me, since you probably were too lazy to even read the Cliff Notes, baby girl.