Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-17 03:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #3056 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3056 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)how did I not see this happen. I'm not riddler-anon. I'm really not. I'm just a stupid kid who's excited that for once their skill-set could be of use... and I wonder about precisely the unreadable-part. because in one case apparently it was readable (I guess I didn't see all riddler-anon-posts), though a bit awkward.
I know there's probably no big secret behind it, but is there ever? I mean, we've all tried guessing who mystery-pairingXYZ was, or which movie was behind vaguereferencezyx once in a while, so why not indulge them for a bit?
Dammit, I just like playing detective on a really low level because I'm too stupid for Cicada or even Mt.Chilliad!!
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)Because you are one of probably about three users who give a shit, and if you encourage this crap then they'll keep doing it.
This isn't "Mysterious Codes Secrets". How is stroking someone's ego related to fandom in the slightest? We have precious few decent secrets these days at the best of times, and now you want to enable some idiot into making even more irrelevant crap that makes people think this place isn't worth bothering with?
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)Called it.
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-18 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)Still not Riddler anon, but I'm beginning to think they're either YOU or just laughing their ass off, anyway.
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)Hi, Riddler anon.
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)Aren't there puzzle comms? Isn't there somewhere who'd appreciate your fun and give you the attention you so desperately seem to crave for being oh-so-clever (but apparently not clever enough to realize how image resolution works)?
Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Riddler-anon?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-17 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Riddler-anon?