Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-17 03:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #3056 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3056 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-18 12:52 am (UTC)(link)I think the feeling is just different, I guess? You can use certain narrative devices in fanfic (making unelaborated-upon references to canon events or status quos) that you can't use in original stories unless it's near the end of the story after the plot has set up a large amount of the "canon." Whereas the reference to established canon can be the starting-point for fanfic. And exposition in fanfic does feel different than exposition in an original story, though of course that's more nebulous.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-18 02:42 am (UTC)(link)I understand that, I suppose my issue comes with the fact that if you're in a fandom for something then you've HAD to do that with the original canon. Whatever it was -- TV, movie, book -- couldn't use those narrative devices, but clearly you could deal with that if you were invested enough to be in the fandom.
And again, the complaints about infodumping in the original post is just bad writing, whether it's original or not. I just don't see how they're comparable.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-18 03:04 am (UTC)(link)