[ SECRET POST #3057 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3057 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Polandball]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The X-Files]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nick Lea/Krycek]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Plague Inc Evolved]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



07.
[Grimm]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Discworld]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Magi the labrynth of magic]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Clangers]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Out of Character

[(Anonymous)]

I do this too. I love developing characters more fully.

But I wonder if it's a different conversation? Like, is it really OOC if the character has no characterization? (I assume you stay true to the small bits that are there, or do you mean you ignore that in favor of your own characterization?)

Re: Out of Character

[herpymcderp]

Well, I haven't ever really ignored characterization that's already there. I just expand on it. You could argue that those sorts of interpretations take the character in a different direction than the one that was theoretically intended, though.

I have seen people just straight up replace minor characterization to marvelous effect, though. So maybe that's kind of the same thing?

But yeah, I do a lot of making up of personalities for one-dimensional characters, especially if that character is "the catty one" or "the stoic one".