case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-19 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3058 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Ughhhhh

(Anonymous) 2015-05-19 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
But the anon didn't say "this is your creepy fap fodder and you are a creepy old man, you creepy fapper you". That only happened in your hypothetical example, but you appear not to grasp that distinction. Calling a relationship between two fictional characters creepy isn't at all a judgement on the person who wrote them. It is a judgment about the writing, because it's a judgement about the characters.

I feel like there's a reason you've overreacted to this and that's your problem to deal with, but make no mistake, you are definitely overreacting.

Re: Ughhhhh

(Anonymous) 2015-05-20 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
It's called hyperbole, but that's a nice armchair you have there. Do you do psychology from it often?

Re: Ughhhhh

(Anonymous) 2015-05-20 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't offer an diagnosis, and it hardly requires psychology of any kind to tell that someone is overreacting when they're making up the other side's arguments. It also doesn't require psychology to tell when someone has poor reading comprehension and a big ol' chip on their shoulder when someone points it out.