case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-19 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3058 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2015-05-20 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
But the anons aren't the only hurt ones. dethtoll's not assuming that all anons are trying to troll him out of malice, he's assuming that because one or several anons spent like a fucking year incessantly trolling him. when a user or group of users keeps making the same critique of named posters across several different threads and days, people don't just assume it's stalking because they're dicks; they're assuming that because someone fucking stalked jaybie until they had to delete their account and we don't want that to happen again.

And obviously, it's not as though anons can just ask other anons to stop trolling, in the same way that we can ask named users to change their behavior. But can you at least understand that this shit comes out of a history? If named users should pull back on assuming that all anons are all the same, I think it's reasonable to say that anons should also pull back, if not on trolling, then at least on being pissy about the assumptions that users make.

(of course, I suspect this is where the argument goes sideways, but w/e)