[ SECRET POST #3058 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Ughhhhh

[(Anonymous)]

I see no one getting over emotional, and if people were, why would you imagine it's because people disagree with the value judgement? I think 50 year olds with 22 year olds is about as pathetic as OP does, but I still most definitely think it's neither their nor my place to suggest this writer is "creepy" for writing it. Agreeing/disagreeing with the value judgement is totally irrelevant; the fact is the value judgement has no place in a writing critique.

And on the exact same note, disliking and judging "vapid wish-fulfillment" or "pandering/self-indulgent fantasy" is also one hell of a value judgement, and reflective of your own personal taste, so yes, that would invalidate the critique. It's not critique at all.