case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-19 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3058 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: not op

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-05-20 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's pretty clear from reading my comment that I'm on a tangent here.

I said:

I'm not saying it's not judgmental or that it would be appropriate for this situation (I'd make a terrible writer and I guess my empathizing so much with OP is one reason why)

I'm staying away from the whole "is this good/bad critique" argument for a reason. I'm specifically defending OP's, and people's in general, use of the word "creepy" since apparently some people think it's a personal attack.

And since we've done this before, I'll just say right now that if you're going to keep harping on the thing I wasn't actually saying because it's more relevant to the origin of the thread, I'm not going to continue to engage.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: not op

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-05-20 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
So, you went on about something unrelated to the OP's conversation, and now you're mad that someone replied to it as connected to the OP's issues?

That's a strange thing to get your jimmies rustled over. If you're "on a tangent" and don't want to discuss it in the context of the OP's point, maybe you should start your own thread on the issue. That's what I do when a thought has been sparked by an OP but I'm not really replying to them or wanting to discuss their point.

I'm not going to continue to engage.

Then simply do so. Right now you come across like those little kids that go "I'm not talking to you!" *talks to you* *keeps talking to you* "I said I'm NOT talking to you!!!!"
Edited 2015-05-20 17:22 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: not op

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-05-23 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean do you never go on tangents? Ever? Maybe not; you're literally the only person I've had this issue with. That's how threads work, though, and why sub-threads exist - people start to talk about related things as they go along.

I said I'm not going to continue to engage if you continued to harp on an issue past one comment. I said it once (in the comment you just replied to) so I'm not sure why you are under the impression that I said it earlier.