case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-19 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3058 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3058 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Ughhhhh

(Anonymous) 2015-05-20 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I'm not sure how it works in the college they're going to, but in my university courses, the goal was to achieve a professional standard of writing when it comes to critiques. Maybe that's different in other countries, though. But in my classes, a text written in the way OP's critique was written would probably not have been accepted for sounding too colloquial.
But even if that wasn't the case/this isn't actually a college/uni-class but some other kind, it still sounds too judgy and subjective to be of any real help for the writer. Because it's not a critique of the writing, for the most part, but rather a "Ugh, this squicks me" and "but my FEELS say it's bad".