case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-21 06:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #3060 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3060 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
right, i mean as a way of manipulating specific areas, it can have benefits in similar ways that massage can have benefits

but it does not actually cure illnesses by redirecting the flow of chi in your body as practicioners claim

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
If you have a foolishly reductive understanding of the meaning of the word chi, and no historical knowledge of the development of both TCM and Western medicine, I can see why you'd feel that way.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
tell me more about your chi theories

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
lol
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2015-05-21 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I did some quick digging. Apparently, there's a history of really bad studies on the subject. This meta-analysis looks pretty good, though, at least to my untrained eye: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/Mobile/article.aspx?articleid=1357513 It concludes that acupuncture works better than sham treatments for some kinds of pain.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
which i would argue is consistent with my claims

and i don't think you will find any evidence for the broader claims

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
"Working" for pain is a tough thing to measure, I believe, because pain by its nature is subjective. If you think you feel better, then it worked. Since the introduction of fake needles into acupuncture studies, there's been pretty good evidence that both real AND fake needles "work." There's also dry needling, which is a less spiritually-based therapy technique that is supposed to release trigger points, helping with some kinds of muscle pain. That's really different than putting a needle in a chi point in your elbow to cure your back pain.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, when I have serious neck and head pain due to muscle tension, I can take benzodiazepines or I can get dry needled. The efficacy is about the same for me, with a vast reduction in side effects for the dry needling. And that kind of pain is exactly where there are substantiated claims.