case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-21 06:23 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #3060 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3060 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
He's not in the sun; that's a TV studio, so it'd be artificial lighting and, presumably, a stint in the make-up chair beforehand.

The depth/darkness of the lines, however, looks as though it has more to do with the secret's stint in Photoshop.

This is the original: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/multimedia/archive/00365/VIDEO_Hugh_Grant_Da_365788a.jpg

Still not great, but not quite as horrific as the secret makes it out to be.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Looks like some of my nordic relatives, whatever.

He's got his hair, and he doesn't seem to be going blind. That's not so bad.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
...he's only 54.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
wait, he's 54?

that really doesn't look that bad for 54, tbh

(Anonymous) 2015-05-21 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
lol really? He's one short jump from being the cryptkeeper's twin.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
As a 53-year-old, I am crushed by your statement.

But also amused.

Wait, so you're saying IP logging is on?

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Well, does he smoke? Because for a 54-year-old smoker, yeah, that's not so bad.

I guess it's not terrible for a fair-skinned non-smoker either. Skin's getting a bit loose and freckly, but it happens.

Re: Wait, so you're saying IP logging is on? (sa)

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, that comment title was for a bit of snark I didn't post.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-22 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
That... that actually looks worse to me?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only