[ SECRET POST #3060 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3060 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #437.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously?

Then again, didn't he cheat on her with Wonder Woman?

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

http://observationdeck.io9.com/lois-lane-to-out-superman-1700222604

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Try posting a link that actually works.

http://kotaku.com/superman-and-lois-lane-probably-aren-t-friends-anymore-1701717016

It remains to be seen where DC goes with this... I thought outing Grayson was an interesting choice and so far it's borne fruit, but outing Supes? I wouldn't be surprised if this saw a cosmic retcon a few years down the road.

Then again, maybe not. I think DC is purposely trying to shake things up a bit, which can be a risky strategy in an industry and a fandom that is hostile to change.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

Still wish they wouldn't destroy Lois Lane to do it.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Nobody's destroying Lois Lane. She's always been a dogged reporter. That's who she is. If she has no vested interest in keeping Supes' identity private, then of course she's going to do her job.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

I will destroy Lois Lane.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Nobody asked you, Dan Didio.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Clark and Lois aren't together in the post-Flashpoint/New 52 continuity and never were.

The Superman/Wondy relationship has been pretty cute so far, though, except in the hands of incompetent writers which has been blessedly rare.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

You think the DC Comicsverse is trying to be like the MCU where secret identities aren't really a much of a thing there?

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Slight misfire, my post meant to go to the one you had above with the link, but the question still stands.

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

All good!

Re: DC Comics *SPOILERS*

[dethtoll]

Considering that Marvel and DC have been borrowing ideas from each other for decades, yeah, that's a good possibility.

I do feel like the move to LA has been good for DC -- most of their lineup has been consistently good since Forever Evil. Convergence has been a disappointment, though.