[ SECRET POST #3062 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[herpymcderp]

Well, yes and no.

On the one hand, there's not a lot of cause to try to manufacture photographic lenses by hand so there aren't really people doing it that way anymore. On the other hand there are still some old pieces kicking around as part of collections and whatnot, and I have heard that for certain productions directors will pay to get their hands on them.

It wouldn't be impossible, but it isn't practical. And it isn't something the majority of audiences actually want out of their movie-going experience, which is the larger issue. Times change and so do tastes and conventions.

[(Anonymous)]

NA but I guess more than anything I'm surprised that a Malick-type person or someone like that hasn't tried to do something like that.

[herpymcderp]

Well I've seen production photos of modern directors using 1930's style cameras on set, but I don't think they've been used to shoot an entire movie since...well, the 50's probably. It's more of an artistic conceit that sometimes gets employed when someone is making a movie about Hollywood.

I think it was Ed Wood that purportedly had several scenes shot with older camera equipment, but that might just be an artistic quirk.