case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-23 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3062 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe it's because of less overall plastic surgery. People's faces had character back then, it wasn't the same parade of generic faces you get today. With some notable exceptions. Scarlett Johansson for one.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)

[personal profile] sabotabby 2015-05-24 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
That's my feeling too. I mean, what others have said re: film quality and black-and-white, but I think people's faces had a lot more imperfections that made them interesting to look at. I actually notice it more with men than women; I think most (young, white, American) leading male actors look roughly the same, whereas there's much more variety amongst the equivalent leading men back in the day.