case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-23 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3062 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3062 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I see. Well, if that's the case then I'd suggest a distinction should be made between:

1) Whether or not there are black women out there who are trying to look white by styling their hair/make up a certain way

2) Whether or not it's a good idea to suggest to a black woman that this is in fact what she is doing when you have no idea whether or not that's her intention.


#1 is arguable. You'll never convince me #2 is a good idea, and since that was the point of my original comment, I'll stand by it.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
#2 is kind of irrelevant though because no single person was being discussed

There's no way anyone could reasonably conclude that #2 was what the OP was saying because she not only wasn't personally addressing anyone but didn't even refer to anyone specifically, not even a specific actress by name.

Thus I'm kind of perplexed that you're standing by your original comment because there's no way #2 was in any way relevant to what OP was saying.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
It was veering OT when I made the comment, I agree. But since people objected to #2 as though I were arguing #1, I'd say it's very relevant to distinguish between the two and clarify that I never said anything about whether #1 does or does not happen in real life.