Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-23 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3062 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3062 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is Amy Shumer a rapist?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)Did you even click on the link?
The story is quoting a story Schumer herself told during an awards banquet. The full transcript is on line (the story links it at http://www.vulture.com/2014/05/read-amy-schumers-ms-gala-speech.html). I suppose it's possible the entire thing is fictional, but it's all over the Internet being quoted approvingly, so it's not like they did it to hurt her.
And thought catalog is not really an MRA site.
Re: Is Amy Shumer a rapist?
I was like, "Oh, okay, this is an anonymous sender on a clickhole site. K then." and just stopped reading there.
Still it depends on your definition of rape, on how much Ms. Schumer is exaggerating for comedic effect, on how much of it is manufactured whole cloth for a self-deprecative joke (you know, the kind of thing she's known for)...
In short: who knows.
Re: Is Amy Shumer a rapist?
(Anonymous) 2015-05-23 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)Second, I don't think that any of this kind of verbal defense would be extended if Schumer was a man. And I think (although I applaud the urge not to rush to judgment) that in a lot of ways that's basically a good thing - not that we should to rush to condemn, but that our instinct really should be not to cavil about "well who knows about what really happened" and "well, was it really rape" and all that kind of thing, but that it should be centered on the victim - those are ideas that I broadly agree with. And so it's really kind of sad to see so many people them abandon them almost immediately when the person talking about it is a female comedian and one that we happen to like. It's kind of shocking.