case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-27 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3066 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3066 āŒ‹

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Christopher Walken]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Harry Potter/Parvati Patil]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Mummy]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[tokyo ghoul]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Ioan Gruffudd/Alexander Siddig/Dominic Keating/Max Pirkis]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2015-05-27 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I think well of fandom as a whole, but judge a lot of commonly-judged fandom phenomena that I consider harmful, etc.

But what gets on my nerves most is the prevalence in certain corners of misconceptions based on bad reading comprehension. not difficulty of access to canon. They should be easy to clear up, but no. People eat up second-hand interpretations and leave them at that.

S!B I start a lot of semantic arguments IRL, sometimes just out of habit. Maybe I’m misinterpreting them, too.