case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-05-27 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3066 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3066 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Christopher Walken]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Harry Potter/Parvati Patil]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Mummy]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[tokyo ghoul]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Ioan Gruffudd/Alexander Siddig/Dominic Keating/Max Pirkis]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: It stopped raining here for the first time in like a week

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-05-29 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay but I don't think we're talking about the same thing here. I'm not talking about libertarians. I'm talking about straight-up liberals in the US who seem conservative in comparison to other places, and I'm asking if their fiscal views is the reason why, because fiscally liberal in the US = fiscally conservative elsewhere, OR whether socially liberal in the US was ALSO seen as socially liberal elsewhere, which I rather doubt.

I get that it may be common in other places for the two to go so hand-in-hand that you can take for granted that one equals the other, but it's still a valid question and it's still possible to break down views by category.