[ SECRET POST #3067 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3067 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Silicon Valley]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I mean, yeah. If it's a fully fleshed out character, well written as a human being before "woman", then the character acting sensually is not really a problem, because it's believable. Whereas if the character isn't well-written, and just seems there for the purpose of being sexual for the enjoyment of the audience, then that is obnoxious. What's the problem here?

And I will say it can be very dependent on how the character is portrayed sensually. Are there gratuitous scenes of her being naked that aren't really necessary? Does the camera lovingly slide up her every curve? Does it seem like the character is being sexual for the audience, rather than the character being sexual to someone she is flirting with?

I'm not saying there aren't Tumblrinas who are inconsistent with their opinions, but that doesn't mean criticizing unnecessary sexualization of female characters (especially when male characters aren't treated that way) is invalid.