[ SECRET POST #3067 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3067 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Silicon Valley]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #438.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But, people will say "So and so writes amazing characters" or "The characters in X are fantastic" all the time. At least in my circles they do. they're very clearly giving props specifically to the writers and actors where applicable. That's why people use the term "character" - they're intrinsically pointing out that it's a fabrication, which in turn means that the positive qualities in it can be ascribed to the creator.

And in comics, you'll routinely have people rec a specific writer's run on a character as getting it "Right."

So unless your ability to understand context is so limited that people must say "Wow, I think Natasha is a great character, which means I think that the scriptwriter did a good job in writing her" for you to get it, I'm not sure what the complaint is.