fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3071 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3071 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Colin Mochrie and Ryan Stiles from Whose Line is it Anyway?]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Ansatsu Kyoshitsu]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Boardwalk Empire]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Ore Monogatari]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Kid Icarus]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Eurovision]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Elden Henson, Daredevil]

__________________________________________________

09.

[His Dark Materials]

__________________________________________________

10.

(Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)

__________________________________________________

11.

[Elfquest]

__________________________________________________

12.

[Psych]

__________________________________________________

13.

(Marvel's Agents of SHIELD)

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

You have a point, yea. (Well said!)

It is a somewhat complicated matter and I can see how in certain cases (not this one) the intent of the comments could be hard to determine. In others where it's more plain then maybe prosecuting would work, but I suppose given the nature of the net and free speech it would be difficult to have a standard about such things; a case by case basis is necessary.

Maybe given time there will be better guidelines, but you're right, I doubt 'this was a joke' would work in most cases; there would still be some consideration.

Well, there does need to be some kind of standard. The Supreme Court just declined to actually say what the standard should be. (For several reasons, probably - the reason they gave is because the question never really came up in any of the lower courts that heard the case, but they also probably didn't want to deal with the First Amendment issues, and also John Roberts just absolutely loves narrow opinions with strong majorities).

I imagine they'll probably have to clarify the point sometime down the road.

[ SECRET POST #3071 ]

Re: The Cyberbullies have won.

Re: The Cyberbullies have won.