case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-15 06:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #3085 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3085 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #441.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
The movie isn't even out yet and you're assuming the new characters are more deserving of existing why? Because they have vaginas? Fuck that.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, exactly that. Another film starting all males does not deserve to exist as much as a film giving women a chance to get out of the fucking kitchen.

And frankly, fuck you if you disagree.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
I sincerely hope this is either sarcasm or someone posting from the 1950s.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT but that's kind of... ridiculously hyperbolic as a response

Like if this movie bombs all women are going to be forced into domestic servitude or something?

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I can't wait to see the womyn and tumblrinas cry when this flops and the male counterpart makes more money.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately reboots in general don't tend to do very well. Regardless, sexism will inevitably be the reason this one flops. Not because reboots are fighting against a cloud of nostalgia but because there aren't enough penises. (Penii?)

(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
What? Why do you think that? I've seen that most reboots do great.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-06-16 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
it can go either way. But rebooting classics like this can be give or take. There's an element of the fandom that says "fuck you, this doesn't need a reboot" and the closely relatied group of willing to go see it but very high standards. If this movie is mediocre a lot of people will declare that it out and out sucks. On the other hand, if general consensus is that it's continuing a proud tradition, it could do great.

A reboot of something that sucks is easier, but ghostbusters has a following all these years later for a reason.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-06-16 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
You'll probably be here saying we need to watch it for representation's sake if it turns out to be shit, since representation always matters more then quality right?