[ SECRET POST #3091 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3091 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #442.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

No. By definition it is not. What political group was he hoping working with against?

sa

[(Anonymous)]

Woops, I meant "was he hoping to work with or against"?

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

He was hoping to work with extreme right-wing racist and nationalist parties (and with unorganized people sharing those views), against what he saw as the broad union of liberal, progressive, anti-racist, and minority groups and political forces.

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

terrorism: the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

The fuckhead's political aims were to intimidate black people, force them leave, and start a race war.

Stupid as fuck, but they don't have to be complex.

And given the flags he displayed of white supremacist states...

He is as much a terrorist as the Boston bombers.

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

+1

This isn't even an argument. Anon is just factually wrong

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

Really? Then so is the FBI. :( http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fbi-director-says-charleston-shooting-not-terrorism/

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

I don't care if it's terrorism.

It was clearly a political act. If the FBI director, for some reason God only knows, says otherwise, he's wrong.

Did you read the lad's manifesto?

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

I'm gonna go with the FBI on this and not anons on F!S. :)

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

shut up otakugal

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

+1

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

because law enforcement and the government have been so historically great with race-based issues. :)

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

So...no. He didn't have a political goal. Scaring black people is a HATE crime not terrorism.

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

Wanting to start a civil war between whites and blacks IS a political goal. A fucking stupid one. But still political.

Re: Charleston and Facebook

[(Anonymous)]

It's a political thing if it's in the context of a broader political ideology and goal

Which, in this case, it CLEARLY was