case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-21 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3091 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3091 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #442.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-06-22 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Well I'm not saying there are definitely MRAs around here. I just think people are too complex to be able to say "A person who thinks x, y, and z would also think p and q so they would be really obvious". It wouldn't surprise me if some of the people who complain about SJWs were sympathetic to MRA talking points even if they're not the type to demonize all women.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-06-23 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. Though I wouldn't necessarily call someone an MRA unless they actually claimed the label.

Even within that there's nuance depending on how you define "MRA talking points" because not everything they say is untrue or disagreeable.