case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-29 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3099 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Writing thread

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-06-30 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen numbers in the tens of thousands for people in the US affected and then when you add in people who provide services and friends and family who may have some understanding it may add up to more than one would think.

Re: Writing thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
True but how many of those would ever read the story

I'm not knocking your wanting to research, I think that's great. Only wondering if anyone reading it would actually recognize its level of accuracy
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Writing thread

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-06-30 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not too concerned about it. Accuracy is a goal for its own sake for me, rather than the real goal being avoiding people pointing out mistakes. I get what you're saying though.

Re: Writing thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-30 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
I was seeing it more positively actually, like how many people would have the knowledge to appreciate that it is accurate, they probably wouldnt think about it and take your word for it

I get what you're saying too though