[ SECRET POST #3099 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: morally reprehensible stuff

[(Anonymous)]

But that's a completely different situation, both morally (it's a public utility, not a corporation) and economically (it's a public utility, not a corporation).

A public service like transportation probably has some kind of mandate or goal of keeping prices low and ensuring wide access, and it's a question of getting necessary funding to keep going. A corporation doesn't give a shit about any of that; it's (for the most part) a question of maximizing revenue. Of course they'd like to make someone else pay for shoplifting, if possible, but price increases would not be an effective tool. If they were an effective tool, the corporation would probably already have implemented them regardless of shoplifting.