[ SECRET POST #3104 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3104 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #444.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think the point isn't that the person finds it ridiculous (because we've all felt that way about some ships!) it's the fact that this person went out of their way to say that their father found the ship traumatizing and destroyed his childhood.

Like...why say that? If you look at Bond/Eve Moneypenny (someone pointed out that Bond/Silva is predatory so we can always change that to Bond/Q) saying that your dad thinks it's "traumatizing" that other people ship them has really bigoted overtones. Does the fact that the dad might consider Bond/Eve a brotp mitigate that?

If he wants Bond to stay single in canon, that's one thing (Bond IS a playboy historically). It's the line between saying "I don't like this ship" or "This ship doesn't work for me" and passing judgement on a ship. Which, calling a ship "traumatizing," definitely is.