case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-09 07:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #3109 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3109 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Sense8]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Gatchaman Crowds]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Blue Beetle]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Metroid]


__________________________________________________



09.
[God, the Devil and Bob]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Cell (2000)]


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #444.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-07-10 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
I mostly think that narratives exist independent of their authors after they have been published. Like, yes, it's interesting and can be a point of discussion to know what the author's intentions or background was, but stories exist independently, have a relationship with their viewers/readers, and can freely be interpreted anyway they want. Plus, as far as homoerotic subtext goes, I think it's one of those things that can be hard to completely disprove. Author's intentions in general are, even what they say things mean might not be where they were actually coming from when they wrote it.