[ SECRET POST #3109 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3109 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Sense8]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Gatchaman Crowds]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Blue Beetle]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Metroid]


__________________________________________________



09.
[God, the Devil and Bob]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Cell (2000)]


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #444.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "Pansexuality"

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, bisexuality doesn't really imply one way or the other. Some bi folks are attracted to genderqueer people. Some bi folks are attracted to people who are trans, but not to people who don't fall under the male/female umbrella. Some bi folk are only attracted to cis people. It's pretty individual - which you can also say of straight and gay people, which is a part of why there's a lot of objection to tossing a new label into the mix. Especially when people then attempt to "correct" us on our own identities.

Re: "Pansexuality"

[(Anonymous)]

This, doubly so for your last sentence. I think I know better than you who I get attracted to, please stop claiming I must be pan/straight for finding a transman attractive.