case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-09 07:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #3109 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3109 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Sense8]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Gatchaman Crowds]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Blue Beetle]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Metroid]


__________________________________________________



09.
[God, the Devil and Bob]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Cell (2000)]


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #444.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: "Pansexuality"

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-07-12 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
My basic understanding from this conversation is that people who identify as pansexual chose that label because they felt the term "bisexual" was limiting. That's who I'm talking about, anyway. I'm not talking about bisexual people who are trying to exclude others from their label, which I agree is pretty rude, to the extent that I'm aware of it.

tl;dr I'm seeing a really specific part of this conversation, I think, not the whole thing